MP3s, and the Music of Today Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

MP3s, and the Music of Today - Essay Example Covach’s selections are actually representative of the songs in the 2000s in terms of the diversity in musical forms, genres, and styles of the artists. The artists that were noted were distinct and unique in terms of displaying varied personal images and exudes different musical styles (for instance the songs sung by Carrie Underwood were significantly different from those sung by OutKast). Each artists (whether as solo singers or in bands) and songs have their separate patronizers and target audience who get to appreciate the style and expressions rendered by their favorite singers. These other sets of singers: Radiohead, Gogol Bordello and OutKast compose and sing songs that are also evident of songs in the 2000s in terms of being innovative in their musical prowess of integrating different styles, forms, use of innovative and creative instruments, and the manner by which they interpret their songs to cater to their respective audiences. One does not, however, know these singers in particular where it not relayed through the course. Some trends that could have been overlooked in these surveys of 2000s rock music could be the profiles of audiences: like which particular target audience, in specific demographic factors, cater to each of the identified artists. These profiles, especially age ranges, cultural orientations, gender, and ethnic background, could provide illuminating details in the past, current and future trends that are manifested by the 2000s rock music and could thereby provide some indications on how these trends could persist in the near future. One believes that there are more foreign artists (such as Korean music) that became increasingly popular in the 2000s music. This kind of musical genre and format could be included and would be interesting to evaluate. One prominent artist that contributed to that trend is Psy and K-pop music which were made famous from Korean dramas such as Boys Over Flower and Hot

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE OF THE WRITINGS OF JOHN PIPER AND N.T Thesis Proposal

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE OF THE WRITINGS OF JOHN PIPER AND N.T. WRIGHT ON THE DOCTRINE OF JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH - Thesis Proposal Example The study of the doctrine of justification5 is considered the cornerstone of Christianity6 by many Christian scholars. It is, according to Luther, the article by which the church stands or falls,7 The challenge between Piper and Wright concerns the implication of their views on imputed or incorporated righteousness on justification8 to Christian faith, especially concerning Soteriology.9 On the one hand, Piper’s perspective is that imputed righteousness on justification does not consist merely of belief in Christ alone for salvation, but also submission of every area of one’s life to Christ’s Lordship.10 Thus, Piper unwittingly affirms both â€Å"faith alone† and â€Å"faith not alone† referring to justification, which according to Lybrand constitutes the intrinsic incongruence of these assertions in his (i.e., Piper’s) practical interpretations and teachings.11 This inconsistency could be explained in the way Piper distinguishes justification from sanctification,12 wherein he proposes that to man is given the right to stand with God on account of faith alone.13 Again, Piper maintains, this is something given. Nevertheless, Piper insists that man must live a life that he considers a deadly battle against sin.14 The manner by which he fights such a battle––according God’s will––constitutes s anctification.15 Also important on Piper’s position is the argument that sin has been fought, and won over with the death of Jesus.16 One might contend that if sin has been won over based on Christ’s sacrifice, Piper would not be able to justify his â€Å"faith not alone† portion of his argument. However, he maintains that the right to stand with God is only achieved by eliminating the sin––the one that was already won over on the cross––by way of dying â€Å"in Christ.†17 This is central to his righteousness imputation theory,18 and distinguishes his position from that of Wright’s who proposes, â€Å"incorporated righteousness† as a more